Date: 15th November 2011 at 10:00pm
Written by:

An overreliance upon a single player has been a recurring theme in football throughout the ages. It is an accusation that has been levelled at several Premier League sides, but over the course of the last decade few have been tarred with the ‘one-man team’ tag with greater frequency than Liverpool.

Gérard Houllier’s latter years at Anfield were characterised by an apparently excessive dependence upon Steven Gerrard, with this trait subsequently spilling over into the first half of Rafael Benitez’s regime, before the signing of Fernando Torres – an acquisition which soon prompted the imaginative ‘two-man team’ label (although curiously and contradictorily, the side’s alarming slump following their second-place finish in 2008/09 was attributed by many to the departure of midfielder orchestrator Xabi Alonso).

The sale of Torres and Gerrard’s increasingly common enforced absences were supposed to have banished Liverpool’s overreliance upon talismanic figures to the past, but Swansea goalkeeper Michel Vorm’s recent comments suggest that this may not be the case.

Speaking in the aftermath of the two sides’ recent 0-0 draw at Anfield, Vorm opined:
“Maybe they rely too much on [Luis] Suárez. He is a player with incredible qualities. He’s a world-class player – I’ve played a lot of times against him in Holland and he has scored a few goals against me, so it is funny to see him again. But maybe they rely too much on him. He is a player who can make a difference, you know that. But he didn’t, and they didn’t score. Maybe because we kept him quiet they didn’t have other options. Perhaps that is unlucky for them, because in the future he will score, you can see that. We did our homework and we worked hard for the full 90 minutes to deny him the chances, and that is what you have to do when you arrive at Anfield.”

Last Saturday’s deflating draw with Swansea, arguably Liverpool’s most disappointing home display of the season, saw Suárez marginalised for large periods of the game as he produced an uncharacteristically muted performance.

The effervescent Uruguayan, excellently marshalled by Garry Monk and Ashley Williams, struggled to perforate the Swansea backline, with Liverpool subsequently appearing toothless and far from penetrative, despite the presence of £55m worth of additional attacking talent in Andy Carroll and Stewart Downing.
Liverpool are not the only side in the world whose attacking threat is substantially enhanced by the presence of one such on-song player – few can deny that Manchester City, Arsenal and Barcelona are more daunting prospects with the aid of David Silva, Robin van Persie and Lionel Messi respectively – but statistically speaking it is hard to refute Vorm’s claim.

Continue reading to page 2 of post

5 responses to “Without him, would Liverpool be in trouble?”

  1. paul says:

    no we would not be in trouble

    157 shots on goal and 14 goals this season, 25 shots v swansea, the problem is the goalscorers

    we’ve gone from a team who creates one chance and expect torres to convert, to a team who create 25 opportunities and no one to put it away

  2. Suares says:

    Suares must play against chelsea

  3. paul says:

    he has to play, coz there’s not 2 many alternatives, but after rumours of first tevez and then villa coming in january, keep missing chances and kenny will have to act

    and we won’t get 25 shots in our next 2 games

  4. Jevon says:

    Paul wanna bet?

  5. Ashfah Hussain says:

    We need David Villa to partner him.